Q&A: Repercussions to the Ukrainian Crisis
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم
Question and Answer
Repercussions to the Ukrainian Crisis
Question:
It was mentioned in the Question and Answer dated 22/2/2014, that: “In other words, it is unlikely that the new situation in Ukraine will be exclusively in the interests of one of the three sides, and therefore, any president who will be appointed in Ukraine will be bound by the ropes of these three sides’ productions, at least for the foreseeable future… This solution, however, remains a time bomb that may explode at any time when new circumstances enable any of the three sides to attain complete influence in Ukraine, because these three sides remain capitalistic, and based on interest, so they have no fixed values, instead they change, will be on the side of the most numerous and the most sinister, and the most ruthlessly violent…” Ends.
Today we are seeing the acceleration of events in Ukraine, especially in Crimea, and even the Russian fleet in the Black Sea has warned Ukrainian soldiers today 03/03/2014 to surrender within 12 hours! Does this mean that Russia found itself able to take Ukraine to its side by force, without taking to account the other parties, “America and Europe”, i.e. that the time of the “explosive bomb” has come? How then is it expected for the Ukrainian crisis to end and its situation to stabilize? May Allah (swt) reward you.
Answer:
As we mentioned earlier in the Question and Answer, the current conditions of the three parties do not allow any of them take Ukraine fully to its side, the conditions of 2004 – 2005, and the conditions of 2010 are not like the current conditions, none of the parties today are able to turn its back to the others and take Ukraine fully to its side, therefore, the situation in Ukraine is not expected to settle except as follow:
- Temporarily: the situation in Ukraine can settle if a President who is close to Russia, America and Europe is appointed, i.e. tied with a belt formed by the three parties…
- As for its permanent stability, it will be through returning Crimea to the Islamic State, where goodness will prevail over it and over the whole world, as Islam is a mercy to the worlds. It is worth mentioning that Crimea was part of the Khilafah for decades until Russia invaded it and the Western states conspired with it, annexing it in the late eighteenth century, although Crimea was an Islamic Emirate since 1430 CE, it then became a Wilayah of the Othmani Khilafah State in 1521 CE during the prosperous era of the Khilafah, until the Russians and the Kaffir States conspired against it and were able to separate it from the Othmani State in the year 1783 CE, committing in it massacres and crimes of which beasts would disown, they then annexed it to Russia, which changed the name of its Capital city, from “Aq Masjid” i.e. The White Mosque to the current name “Simferopol”, and for information sake, Al-Qaram (Crimea) means castle or fortress in its ancient people’s language, the Muslim Tatar. Thus, Crimea was an Islamic land for three and a half centuries before Russia occupied it! And therefore, its permanent stability will be by returning it to its origin, an Islamic Wilayah in the upcoming Khilafah State by the will of Allah (swt).
- Otherwise the situation will remain a time bomb, and when any of the three sides “Russian and America and Europe” believes itself able to completely take Ukraine, and turn its back on the other two sides, then it is expected that they will because these sides act according to Capitalism, where there are no values or standards except for “interest”, so if any side believes itself able, then it will forget the others… But if they do not have the ability and turn their back on the others then the crisis in Ukraine will become more complicated. This was demonstrated when Yanukovych miscalculated and refused to sign the trade agreement with the European Union, relying on Russian-American flattery assuming that America would stand with him in the face of the European Union, and the result was that he fled with nothing but his skin… and the new rulers of Kiev also miscalculated when they assumed that they could turn their backs on Russia, and take Ukraine far away from Russia and turn it toward the West, especially the European Union… and the result was the paralysis of the state and other problems!
In conclusion, the three sides have interest in Ukraine:
Russia believes the Ukraine to be one of its possessions! And America wants it to be in NATO, and Europe wants it in the European Union… and the current situation does not allow any of these sides to completely prevail over the other two and take Ukraine completely to its side.
As for what the Russian news agency, Interfax, reported on Monday 3/3/2014 about the Russian fleet in the Black Sea giving the Ukrainian soldiers in Crimea 12 hours to “surrender”, and the demonstrations that Russia is performing… it is to intensify pressure and heat the atmosphere with threatening, so that its opinion will be strongly and effectively heard in any solution to the situation in Ukraine… and therefore more escalation and a tug of war is expected by the three sides so all this will result in a president who will take into account the interests of the three sides temporarily until there are local and regional and international conditions that allow one of the three sides to take Ukraine to its side… or that the Khilafah is established and returns Crimea as it was…
وَاللَّهُ غَالِبٌ عَلَى أَمْرِهِ وَلَكِنَّ أَكْثَرَ النَّاسِ لَا يَعْلَمُونَ
“And Allah is predominant over His affair, but most of the people do not know.” [Yusuf: 21]
3rd Jumada I 1435 AH
4/3/2014 CE